|
OBDII
![]() OBDII (1996 and up)
![]() 0bd II codes PO171 & PO174, 2001 ford 150, v6
|
| next newest topic | next oldest topic |
| Author | Topic: 0bd II codes PO171 & PO174, 2001 ford 150, v6 |
|
Walter Junior Member |
Engine lite on. code scanner reads PO174 & PO171 Bank 1& 2 reading lean. I can't figure out why. Have checked vacume system, egr,MAF, fuel filter, air filter, pvc system Engines running smooth no misfires gas milage good, IP: Logged |
|
bks Member |
quote: Some thoughts: Scan PCM and look at LTFT. If this number is high (over 15%) The PCM is adding fuel because the engine is lean...or get this, because the engine THINKS it's lean. That means you check the O2 sensors (Pre-catalyst). If the sensors are reporting lean (under 450mV) when the vehicle is indeed running rich, then the sensors are indeed reporting incorrectly and need to be replaced. I enrichen the mixture (dump propane into intake)so I have at least 1% CO Precat and make sure the O2 sensors read over 800mV. If they can't reach that level and the heater circuits are working, then it's time for new sensors. The MAF sensors on these get dirty all the time, especially if you are trying to run a K&N filter to get the extra couple of ponies. Your fuel pressure/volume can be too low due to plugged fuel filter, bad regulator or plain bad pump. Check pressure to specs. You can also have a vacuum leak. This code does not normally create a misfire or fuel mileage problems, as the system is still controlling itself, it has just reached an adaptive limit.... IP: Logged |
|
Walter Junior Member |
quote: Ok let me review what I have done so far: replaced O2 sensors bank 1 & 2, new air filter and new fuel filter, checked pcv valve and lines ( have not done a vacume chek)will have to buy gage 1st, checked egr valve. appears to be working (lines are clean and found no build up or dirt in valve, Checked MAF ( crude method probly full of faults I put an ohm meter across leads and had continuity and then made some jumpers from the maf to the connector so I could check for slight input voltage and a change when rpm was incressed only got slight change. also tried to check for leak in air plennun intake by using either and could not get ghange in RPM. IP: Logged |
|
bks Member |
The MAF test you indicated is quite inaccurate, clean the MAF and report back. Also let us know what the BARO reading is before and after if available. IP: Logged |
|
FIXMALL Junior Member |
WALTER, JUST HAD SAME SITUATION ON MY FORD TOOK SOME EFFORT TO FIND PROBLEM (cracked pcv hose)BUT USING A STETHASCOPE I COCOULD HEAR THE VACUUM LEAK. REPLACED PCV AND HOSE RESET COMPUTER NO MORE 171&174= IP: Logged |
|
erick rahzor Member |
usually the heated pcv valve hose in the back is cracked. IP: Logged |
|
melsa1 Junior Member |
Similar problem possible fix: Malfunction Indicator Lamp (MIL) on with codes P0171and P0174. Found a Barometric Pressure (BARO) reading on the scan data of 139 Hz, which is extremely low for this elevation (near sea level). Replaced the Mass Air Flow (MAF) sensor, but the BARO reading is still 139 Hz. 2. After resetting KAM, drive the vehicle and perform 4 sustained accelerations at greater than half throttle (obeying local traffic laws, of course). Then recheck the BARO reading to verify that it stayed at or above 150 Hz. IP: Logged |
All times are CT (US) | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
![]() |
|
Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.45c
The OBD-II Home Page is hosted by B&B Electronics of Ottawa, Illinois